Using Hooks¶

Hooks are a powerful tool that allow you to inject code into various stages of the evolutionary process. You can add hooks to both Problem instances and SearchAlgorithm instances. This page will demonstrate how you can use hooks to add additional functionality to your evolutionary pipeline.

Problem Hooks¶

`before_eval_hook`¶

You can inject code before the evaluation of a SolutionBatch using the before_eval_hook property. You can append functions to this property that take, as argument, a SolutionBatch instance. Let us suppose that you want to catch scenarios where your custom SearchAlgorithm has produced inf decision values. Let's define this as a function:

from evotorch import SolutionBatch
import torch


def abort_if_inf(batch: SolutionBatch):
    if torch.any(torch.isinf(batch.values)):
        raise ValueError("SearchAlgorithm created inf values!")

Adding this hook to a problem class is straightforward. Consider the sphere problem:

from evotorch import Problem


def sphere(x: torch.Tensor) -> torch.Tensor:
    return torch.sum(x.pow(2.0))


problem = Problem("min", sphere, solution_length=10, initial_bounds=(-1, 1))

You can add the abort_if_inf function as a hook to execute before a SolutionBatch is evaluated using:

problem.before_eval_hook.append(abort_if_inf)

Checking that the hook is now in use is as simple as attempting to pass a SolutionBatch to the problem instance which contains at least 1 inf value, which will cause the ValueError we designed earlier to be triggered::

dodgy_batch = problem.generate_batch(10)  # Generate a SolutionBatch of size 10
dodgy_batch.access_values()[1, 1] = float("inf")  # Inject a rogue inf value
problem.evaluate(dodgy_batch)  # Pass the SolutionBatch to the problem to evaluate

Output

ValueError: SearchAlgorithm created inf values!

`after_eval_hook`¶

Similarly, you can inject code to execute immediately after a SolutionBatch instance has been evaluated using the after_eval_hook property. This hook works exactly as before_eval_hook, except that it also allows us to return a dict instance which will be added to the status of the Problem and therefore the status of a SearchAlgorithm instance using that problem. Let's consider the scenario where we wish to track the memory usage on our hardware every time a SolutionBatch instance is called. We can define a function which returns this information as a dict:

import psutil


def report_memory_usage(batch: SolutionBatch):
    return {"mem usage": psutil.virtual_memory().percent}

and add it to our problem just as before:

problem.after_eval_hook.append(report_memory_usage)

If we now create a SearchAlgorithm instance and optimize for a few iterations with the StdOutLogger we will observe that "mem_usage", the memory usage of the machine, is now being reported in the searcher.status and therefore by the StdOutLogger:

from evotorch.algorithms import SNES
from evotorch.logging import StdOutLogger

searcher = SNES(problem, stdev_init=1.0)
logger = StdOutLogger(searcher)
searcher.run(3)

Output

        iter : 1
    mean_eval : 12.302145004272461
  median_eval : 12.144983291625977
pop_best_eval : 6.008919715881348
    best_eval : 4.496272563934326
  worst_eval : 22.681987762451172
    mem usage : 30.1

        iter : 2
    mean_eval : 8.87697696685791
  median_eval : 8.475287437438965
pop_best_eval : 4.878612041473389
    best_eval : 4.496272563934326
  worst_eval : 22.681987762451172
    mem usage : 30.1

        iter : 3
    mean_eval : 12.097428321838379
  median_eval : 11.44112491607666
pop_best_eval : 4.2585768699646
    best_eval : 4.2585768699646
  worst_eval : 22.681987762451172
    mem usage : 30.1

SearchAlgorithm Hooks¶

`before_step_hook`¶

Much like Problem allows you to inject hooks before and after evaluation, SearchAlgorithm allows you to inject hooks before and after the call to _step. You can inject code before _step using the before_step_hook property. This function takes no arguments, but we can easily exploit class definitions or global variables to achieve complex behaviour. Let's suppose that we want to keep track of the variables \(\mu\) and \(\sigma\), corresponding to searcher.status['center'] and searcher.status['stdev'], respectively, using global variables mu and sigma:

mu = None
sigma = None


def update_global_distribution_vars():
    global mu, sigma, searcher
    mu = searcher.status["center"].clone()
    sigma = searcher.status["stdev"].clone()

If we now add this hook to our searcher and run it for some iterations we can observe the global mu and sigma variables changing every time we step the searcher:

searcher = SNES(problem, stdev_init=1.0)
searcher.before_step_hook.append(update_global_distribution_vars)
for _ in range(3):
    searcher.step()
    print(f"Last mu: {mu}")
    print(f"Last sigma: {sigma}")

Output

Last mu: tensor([ 0.5075, -0.0859, -0.4649,  0.6813,  0.1237, -0.5578, -0.8896,  0.2800,
        -0.4438,  0.1856])
Last sigma: tensor([1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1.])
Last mu: tensor([ 0.5075, -0.0859, -0.4649,  0.6813,  0.1237, -0.5578, -0.8896,  0.2800,
        -0.4438,  0.1856])
Last sigma: tensor([1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1., 1.])
Last mu: tensor([ 1.0853,  0.3743, -0.2238,  0.4539,  0.3474, -0.2821, -0.1601,  0.4664,
        -1.0065,  0.1527])
Last sigma: tensor([1.0659, 1.0077, 0.9795, 0.9146, 0.8209, 0.9982, 0.9484, 0.9260, 0.7501,
        1.1041])

Important

SNES will not update the search distribution in its first step as, initially, its population contains unevaluated solutions.

`after_step_hook`¶

You can also inject code after the call to _step using after_step_hook. This works identically to before_step_hook except that, much like after_eval_hook for the Problem class you may also return a dict which will be added to the searcher's status dictionary. For example, let's use the update_global_distribution_vars as before, but now also add a hook to apply after the step which calculated the euclidean movement in \(\mu\):

def euclidean_movement():
    global searcher, mu
    return {"mu_movement": torch.norm(searcher.status["center"] - mu).item()}

If we now add this to after_step_hook, add a StdOutLogger instance and run for some iterations we will see that the status dictionary now tracks the euclidean movement in \(\mu\):

logger = StdOutLogger(searcher)
searcher.after_step_hook.append(euclidean_movement)
searcher.run(3)

Output

        iter : 4
    mean_eval : 12.15910816192627
pop_best_eval : 5.9899001121521
  median_eval : 11.250519752502441
    best_eval : 0.4812171459197998
  worst_eval : 26.787078857421875
    mem usage : 31.0
  mu_movement : 1.1693975925445557

        iter : 5
    mean_eval : 8.20405387878418
pop_best_eval : 3.2686986923217773
  median_eval : 6.675857067108154
    best_eval : 0.4812171459197998
  worst_eval : 26.787078857421875
    mem usage : 31.0
  mu_movement : 1.1225664615631104

        iter : 6
    mean_eval : 7.373251914978027
pop_best_eval : 3.3824539184570312
  median_eval : 6.133779048919678
    best_eval : 0.4812171459197998
  worst_eval : 26.787078857421875
    mem usage : 31.0
  mu_movement : 1.0265130996704102

Using Hooks¶

Problem Hooks¶

before_eval_hook¶

after_eval_hook¶

SearchAlgorithm Hooks¶

before_step_hook¶

after_step_hook¶

`before_eval_hook`¶

`after_eval_hook`¶

`before_step_hook`¶

`after_step_hook`¶